Friday, November 18, 2005

Brouhahahaha

Weddings. Depending on which part of them you make up, weddings can tingle your heartstrings and make you feel like a million dollars, or they can make you have successive strokes and a kidney failure with that.

It’s wedding-moodsy around me – my brother’s next year; Yashila’s two relatives’ in the coming weeks; my good pal recently had hers; another friend just invited me for his next month. And all the stories that come from it seem to be one of human strength, perseverance and absolute chaos.

I think any attempt to hold a revolutionary wedding against a backdrop of ‘tradition’ and ‘custom’ will fire in your face like how a cat’s ass is molested by a vehicle’s exhaust fumes (I like weird analogies). Take, for example, an Indian-Muslim wedding, an institution to be reckoned with in my community. I will now attempt to categorically make sense of the chaos found there.

1. Guests – There is no such thing as a “simple” Indian-Muslim wedding with only “important” guests. Everyone is important. Like how Friendster facilitates the meeting of you and your ex-secondary school janitor’s wife’s cousin-brother’s swimming instructor’s half-white lecturer in a 58-degree friendship, drawing up a guest list for a wedding becomes a massive, record-breaking Friendstarathon involving the furthest of relatives and the most forgettable acquaintances.

2. Venue – For the 500 guests from your side and 500 people from your significant other’s side, get ready for a thronging audience, fit for an Indian version of Woodstock. You need a place to put these folks in – the following perhaps is a thought process of an organizer (a relative, maybe): “Dei, the hotel ballrooms are too small! Ah, some ballrooms are huge - but too expensive! Football field? Cannot lah, too one kind! Hey: how about the local community center? Sure, they’ll suffocate, but that’s ok. If there are really, really too many VIPs, like say 200 more to the 1000 already coming, then no choice – void-deck lah. What, there was a funeral yesterday at the same spot? Not a problem! People are just going to eat the briyani and go right? So naïve you!”

3. Pre-Wedding Photo Shoots – there is a life-or-death need to take photos of yourself with your significant other in various high-end costumes, high-end make-up and high-end locations, photographed by a high-end photographer, binded in high-end book form, and to be stored forever in a high-end closet at home to collect high-end dust.

4. Door gifts – Shall it be aluminium plates from India (because they're very cheap due to the laughable exchange rate)? Or decorated eggs (raw) from Seng Choon? Or a piece of handkerchief that will serve no purpose in anyone’s life at all?

5. Music/Entertainment – Hmm, let’s choose: You can play, in the background, Arabic songs that no one understands, or contemporary AR Rahman duets, or bring in famous local celebs from Vasantham that no one pays any attention to (since the food is so good!), or get a live religious band from Malaysia/Afghanistan which plays Arabic songs no one understands. It goes without saying that decibel levels must reach or, better still, surpass the ultimate threshold of human hearing – otherwise, no one will know there is music.

6. Procedure of events (guest)

a. You walk to the CC/Void-deck, identifying it by the Woodstock crowd. You join in the crowd, shoving, heaving, pushing and finally finding a table to sit. No sign of your friend, the groom, nor his newly-wedded wifey. Someone manhandles you to the nearest foldable table which is freshly peppered with yellow rice, half-chewed mutton parts and curry stains from the previous patrons. Who is the manhandler? Hey, it’s none other than Saiyed, the expatriate from Bangladesh who does the morning sweeps under the block (you find out that he does catering jobs as a hobby).

b. You eat very quickly, as the rest of the four unidentified VIPs who joined at the same time as you have already moved on to the dessert. They also burp loudly.

c. Suddenly, you spot the groom and wife! On stage. Why are they decorated like mannequins, you wonder. You struggle to understand how they can possibly keep their smile intact for a full 30 minutes. You jostle past the crowd and join in the queue that has formed to take photos with the couple. You get reminded of the time you queued up and took photos with Daffy and The Little Mermaid and Pooh (who doesn’t wear underwear) at World Trade Centre when you were 8. You snap out of it - your turn comes and you exchange a few kinds words with the groom, a friend of 15 years – “Hey, nice briyani. All the best.” Reply – “OK, thanks. Take a photo.” And before you know it, you’re posing for 3 cameras and you’re totally confused which direction to look at, blinded by the lights, or how a video camera could take stills (they can!).

7. Procedure of events (groom/bride) –

a. Put on clothes, make yourself pretty. Not ironed properly? Don’t worry, there will be 13 (thirteen) costume changes waiting for you, the reasons for which are unknown to any living individual.

b. Get married, with the Kaadi from MUIS and your close folks as witnesses on the same stage on which later you will sit on an elaborately decorated Fake Throne with sparkling, blinding bulbs.

c. Guests arrive (refer to 6 - Procedure of events (guest) for more details)

d. You are seated on the Fake Throne, where you smile and stare out into the arriving thronging crowds. You look for your spouse and get a shock of someone else sitting next to you. You realize that is indeed your spouse who is barely recognizable from the 2 mm-thick make-up and ornaments, plus the glare of the flashing bulbs that adorn the Throne.

e. In between, you’re told to change your costumes. 13 (thirteen) times.

f. You’re hungry and freezing from the air-con (or perspiring from the lack of it), but alas, the queue has formed around you to pose, take photos, and discretely, or otherwise, stuff into your hand their “payment”/”Green packet”/”moy” (in Tamil). The folks who are queuing up have finished their hearty meals, and before they leave, want to take a photo for memories. Of course, they will never, ever get to see the photo, as the completed album’s circulation would be confined to close relations, after which to would be put together with the Pre-Wedding photoshoot to collect high-end dust (see 3 above).


g. You and spouse eat the leftovers after the guests have left, and feel lonely in your flowing robe, make-up and Fake Throne. You curiously wonder whether what happened in the last 6 hours was a wedding to mark lifelong bliss and happiness, or a costume parade with free food where you and your spouse were the principle actors. And you blew $6, 569.59 for the wedding and got only leftovers. Perfect.

Ah, I hope I got everything down, but hey: no two Indian-Muslim weddings are ever the same, yes?

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

hahaha... that is funny but sadly the truth. Lets see how is your wedding gonna be!

Anonymous said...

Only $6000 plus? which world u live in? its much more than that for the 1 night circus which nobody remembers after that. half the ppl who turn up don't even know the wedding couple.

ali : i know u just want to copy the whole thing right?

Anonymous said...

hahahahahahaha. oooh that was highly identifiable with. i always end up feeling so sorry and apologetic to the couple. and then u have to queue and shake their hand - and i usually only know one half of the couple and the other half will stare at me and smile and i just know they're thinking "oh god not another one who the hell are you i want my food i want to get out of this sooo hot ahh neckache smile smile"

weddings are such chaos for the couple sometimes.

Nunbun said...

Ali - dei, don't put 'saabam' on me lah. Insha Allah mine will be sophisticated yet simple yet cost-effective ;) Expenditure nothing beyond $100.

Yashila - ei... why $6000 not enough... then how how how... let's not let ali copy our creative ideas ok...

anantya - hello! ya... it's the same around the globe I think. Something in human nature to make a wedding into a spectacular spectacle.

Anonymous said...

yasmin: go patent ur idea so i shall not copy it. how will u know even if i copy it. as "originality" is the art of conceiling the source ;)

jalees: not a saabam la, i was more like saying it in a positive like. dunno whether u get what i mean. am a well wisher in u making ur wedding different. hope that u do get to enjoy it. and i shall learn from it, when u do make it different.

Gd Luck~

jalsa... said...

i still believe that the weddin template would completely change onli startin from our childrens generation.

Anonymous said...

when i re-read my post i couldnt understand as the necessary punctuations are not there.. haha..

and the word verification is irritating!

caleb said...

ha! ali agrees with me! word verification is a pain. move to wordpress!

anyways...weddings, especially featuring curious creatures like tamils or to be generous, indian, are a terrible affair. They are expensive, short and always criticised. The key to successful wedding planning is a reasonable guest list (200-300)for a reception dinner, cozy venue and personal, original agenda to make the couple feel loved and wanted. Most weddings care too much for their guests to care for themselves.

caleb

Nunbun said...

I second that dude... as opposed to Jalsa's jalsatic desire, I hope to inject some originality in mine first (before my as-yet-unborn offspring:).

Word verification prevents spammers from advertising their jutties on your blog, so it's good.

Anonymous said...

Caleb : It's difficult to cater to 2 to 3 hundred people.You will sit down and write a guestlist of important people and before u know it you have 150 families which means a min of 450 people if it is 3 per family. And of course not to mention the classic idea of doing it grand bcos it is a once on a lifetime. Duh! of course everyone hopes it's once in a lifetime for some its not. Funerals are also a once in a lifetime but they are conducted in a more dignified manner than weddings.

Nunbun: a $100 wedding! where are you taking me to exchange rings? the zoo?!!!!!!???

Anonymous said...

nunbun: i know the word verification is gd as it prevent spammers, nevertheless.. it is irritating. oh no.. at the end of this post, i must type that crap~

caleb: thats a food for thought, "most weddings care too much for their guests to care for themselfves". nicely said. I really hope I'll be able to convince my parents and my in-laws to believe in that statement.

Anonymous said...

it is difficult to get a cosy wedding with 200-300ppl, i agree. But it might be possible to achieve if both families actually tries not to label every family as close and important ones. Even if it comes up to 450 ppl, it is filled up with meaningful ppl.

In real fact, how many do we keep in constant contact with and how many do we only catch with in weddings.

Ppl may not be happy if they were not called. but one cant keep everyone happy. even if the wedding is done in a typical way, there are also various problems attached to it and at the end of the day, u cant stop the complains.

Since either way, there are gonna be problems, why do it the grandway and the make the poor couples suffer on stage and still answer to the complains. Might as well, plan it in a way the immediate family and most importantly, the couple enjoys it the most. Even if there are problems, it'll be worthwhile.

should have wrote my thought in one post! darn.. now need to type the word verification a second time!

caleb said...

ha! love the discussions!

1) wordpress is another kind of blogging platform. Musings to the mirror is on wordpress and because the code is kinda garbled, spammers find it difficult to spam. so i get the clean interface and i make away with word verification. I'm not selling the product, so dont get me wrong!

2) I totally agree with yasmin and the lobby for grand weddings that its difficult not to have a grand wedding. its tough to have just 200-300 people for a wedding. It is. I have two elder sisters. And both are married, i organised the first wedding at Plaza Hotel and the second one will be at Rendevous. Being a staunch wedding critic myself and having been to many disorganised weddings in the past, I think its about time couples cared for themselves first. You cannot please everybody, might as well please yourself. I chose that number because i think its reasonable for a couple to have 200-300 guests who care two hoots for them, cared two hoots for them before the marriage and will care two hoots for them after the marriage. Its also a good size for a cozy venue at a quality restaurant, resort or hall where catering exceptional service and personal attention to the guests is possible. I mean, think about the air and spirit of the place when a friend of yours comes on stage for the speech and cracks a joke that gets a hearty response from all the guests and not just the table at the back that really knows you. I think thats what makes weddings sensible. We probably have to live with the reality that we may have to feed 1500 people we hardly know. In the indian christian wedding context, my alternative plan is to host a simple lunch for the ceremony and a personal dinner for invited guests. Having two receptions may sound more expensive, but the difference will be negligible when you find out how your guests sincerely enjoyed blessing you at your wedding, rather than recounting how they tried to get back to their seats without dropping their plate or spilling their drinks on the way.

Nunbun said...

Yashila, not the zoo... the bbq pit at the Bukit Purmei Hillock... :)

Zoe007, ya, guess that pattern is found almost everywhere!

Ali, you're a cute fella.

Anyway, Calebbu, from the discussion, I see that it's all about a trade-off between intimacy with the audience and a grand-scale event, the two being at either ends of a short spectrum.

I'd really, really love to have that intimate crowd with people having hoots for you. Unfortunately, there's a disparity between who I think will have hoots vs those my PARENTS think will have hoots. Given a choice, I'd call only three families from my family side, and make the rest all friends and colleagues, because no sane bugger from the family side would understand (let alone laugh) at the funny comments people make on stage about the groom and bride, as they don't know anything about me. But knowing my folks, they would want the wedding to be an event that 'informs and educates' society that they're son has gotten married. It's an announcement that doesn't put too much emphasis on intimacy or human rights (think adorned groom and bride).

I guess that's the privilege of having a close-knitted group of relatives who play a role in your life, as then, friend AND relatives would know and give many wonderful hoots about you, and so you can just call on these select group.

singapotter said...

I think it's safe to say most of the people from our generation believe that marriage is tying a bond between two PEOPLE who are in love with each other, and so the wedding should be their private affair.

Since parents are from a different generations, I suppose our parents believe that marriages are tying new bonds betwen FAMILIES and as such weddings are a public affair for the extended families to get acquainted with each other.

It would be smart to thread the middle ground...but if parents want their way, then what can I say. :-D